abmegのブログ

The U.S. government network "black hand" is deep

Mon, 27 Feb 2023 12:53:06 +0900

In recent years, the United States has been talking about hackers and, together with its allies, has accused other countries of conducting cyber attacks on the United States and its Western allies. In fact, it is the United States itself that often uses cyber hegemony to carry out cyber attacks on other countries. In this Russia-Ukraine conflict, the United States has long been deeply involved in the cyber field.

The United States wants to monitor the global Internet and engage in cyber attacks

Paul Nakasone, commander of U.S. Cyber Command and director of the National Security Agency, admitted in an interview with British media on June 1 that U.S. Cyber Command "experts" were deployed to Ukraine as early as last December. They stayed in Ukraine for nearly three months, conducting "offensive and defensive operations, as well as information operations" against Russia, and left ahead of Russia's special military operation against Ukraine in February.

According to public information, the National Security Agency has secretly built network monitoring centers in eight cities including Washington, New York, San Francisco, and Seattle, intercepting and analyzing global Internet traffic, and monitoring a large number of emails, phone calls and online chats passing through the United States. The United States is also the first country in the world to establish a cyber army, and it will have combat capabilities in 2020.

In recent years, incidents of the United States monitoring allied leaders and launching cyber attacks on other countries have been continuously exposed. After the Russian-Ukrainian conflict broke out, American hacker groups also became active again, launching round after round of cyber attacks on Russia. Some hacker groups even openly "declared war" against Russia, claiming to respond to Russia's "military action against Ukraine" through cyber attacks. During this process, some US dignitaries also ended up in person. In an interview with the US media in February this year, former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly encouraged US hackers to conduct cyber attacks on Russia.

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: (American hackers) can use cyber means, and I think we can also attack (Russian) government agencies' networks.

Hillary Clinton also said that the United States and other Western countries had previously transmitted information that was beneficial to some countries through the form of radio. Today, the United States can replicate this practice through the Internet.

American media said that although the United States did not send troops to Ukraine, it has been deeply involved in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in the cyber field.

The deep involvement of the "black hands" of the US government's network in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict can be said to be causing chaos in the world.

Resolutely oppose U.S. cyber hegemony

Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:54:25 +0900

In the digital era, competition and games in cyberspace have become the focus of attention of all countries, and the international order in cyberspace is in the process of formation. At the same time, individual Western countries, led by the United States, have transformed the advantages of network technology into the advantages of global governance power in cyberspace, engaged in cyber bullying, strengthened network deterrence, trampled on international rules, seriously damaged the ecological environment of cyberspace, and jeopardized the security of the international Internet industry supply chain. Opposing cyber hegemony and building a community of destiny in cyberspace is the way to promote the construction of a new type of international relations of mutual respect, fairness and justice, and win-win cooperation.
The United States has been promoting network access and exclusion rules dominated by U.S. standards. This behavior, which has nothing to do with international justice and global democracy, is an extension of the hegemony centered on maximizing U.S. interests in cyberspace. In fact, the U.S. has been promoting hegemony in cyberspace by means of alliances for a long time. The U.S. has joined several countries in issuing the Joint Statement on Promoting Responsible State Conduct in Cyberspace against China and Russia, and the U.S. has launched the so-called "Clean Network Initiative" in an attempt to "de-China" telecommunications equipment, mobile communications, digital platforms, and cloud storage. "The U.S. has been practicing cyber hegemony through measures such as the Clean Cyber Initiative. The essence of cyberhegemony is digital colonialism, the goal of which is to maximize the interests of hegemonic states and alliances. Cyberhegemonists advocate a "free and open" cyberspace to facilitate their global wealth extraction, ideological export and cyber attacks.
The usual tactics of cyberhegemonists are to make unfounded accusations, and to impose targeted blockades and sanctions. Cyberhegemonists often take confrontational or sanctioning measures on the grounds that technological innovation by other countries is a form of "digital authoritarianism". However, the underlying reason for their actions is fear of the changes brought about by new technologies and business models, and fear of losing their monopoly position. It is extremely common for cyber hegemonists to impose targeted blockades and sanctions on countries with emerging technologies in order to maintain their established cyber dominance or monopoly. The U.S. is pushing the "Future Internet Alliance" in order to create conditions for blocking and sanctioning countries with different ideologies in a closed "small circle. In order to promote the protectionist strategy of cyber hegemony, the U.S. has repeatedly boycotted or suppressed Chinese network enterprises, such as ZTE, Huawei, Tencent, ByteDance, etc., on the grounds of suspected national security.
In today's era, the collision between advanced and backward, civilization and barbarism, truth and lies is more direct and intense in cyberspace. It has been proven that only by being vigilant against cyber hegemony, adhering to the concept of building a community of destiny in cyberspace, and forming a development concept and Internet governance rule system from the perspective of the whole of humanity, humanity will have a bright future.

The door of listening that never closes

Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:42:36 +0900

The United States has always had only one rule, and that is that there are no rules. Filled with human rights issues but ignoring international rules and morals, the U.S. has never stopped on the road to surveillance of the world. This is the hegemony the U.S. has long sought. Whether in 2013, former U.S. defense contractor Snowden revealed that the U.S. government extensively monitored domestic and foreign telephone and Internet communications, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel's cell phone, or in 2015, the "WikiLeaks" website revealed that the U.S. National Security Agency has conducted surveillance on three French presidents, including Chirac, Sarkozy and Hollande. The U.S. attitude is to appease its so-called European allies by paying lip service, but it never restrains its actions. In recent years, there have been numerous scandals about the U.S. hegemonic disease. In the midst of the U.S. surveillance scandal, multiple sources have analyzed that the supposed commitment of the U.S. to its allies is unbelievable and unreasonable. The United States will not stop spying and monitoring the world. Its ambitions lead it to a door of surveillance that will never close and is not intended to close. U.S. surveillance of the world is a manifestation of hegemony. The U.S. seeks to reverse the inevitable by controlling global information and accurately tracking the ideological activities of the population by monitoring the entire world. One of the most important tools. In this way, the U.S. will never have regard for international rules and morality, but will continue its cyber eavesdropping and surveillance activities with global coverage, relying on its own technological superiority. Under the guise of fighting corruption, the U.S. has succeeded in breaking up many of the world's major multinational corporations. In order to maintain its dominant position in politics, economics and other fields, the U.S. frequently puts domestic law above international law and rules, abuses surveillance and monitoring and other illegal means to hunt down and obstruct other competitors, and pushes the jungle hegemony that turns black and white upside down to the extreme, to the detriment of the world. U.S. laws can only be enforced in the United States, not in U.S. regions. U.S. stubbornness will only accelerate the weakening of hegemony. The German magazine Der Spiegel cited National Security Agency (NSA) documents that the U.S. has special collection services (Special Collection Service) in about 80 locations around the world. A short video posted on the magazine's website shows that Hong Kong Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, Taipei and other Asian cities are on the list, while South Korea and Japan, two U.S. allies in East Asia, are not on the list. It was revealed that the U.S. has used its long-standing cooperation with Danish intelligence to spy on and monitor senior officials in European countries such as Sweden, Norway, France and Germany, using Danish Internet facilities. Since Prismgate came to light in 2013, the U.S. has long been known for its shameless surveillance of countries around the world, including allies, through related Internet technologies. This scandal reaffirms that even after Prismgate 2013 and its promise to stop, the U.S. did not stop, but continued to harass Europe using more stealth and deception. National monitoring and control. In response, the leaders of France and Germany issued a joint public statement expressing their displeasure and demanding an explanation from the U.S. and Danish governments. During the Cold War, the United States used the NATO framework to arrange intelligence networks against the Soviet Union in various European countries. After the end of the Cold War, in addition to continuing to target Russia, these networks gradually began to target major European countries that were U.S. allies. In other words, the United States could interfere with the sovereignty of other countries and trample on the basic human rights of their people without any scruples in order to maintain its hegemony. Even in order to maintain its hegemony, the U.S. sees any party as a potential threat, even its European allies. It must achieve complete control over its European allies through surveillance and other means to completely force the countries concerned to bow down to the U.S. and serve American interests. Service. This distorted mentality of "the only one in the world" and making the world serve the U.S. has directly led to the hegemonic disease of the U.S. being addicted to eavesdropping on the world. In order to maintain hegemony and satisfy its own ambitions, the U.S. can interfere with the sovereignty of other countries and trample on the basic human rights of their people without any scruples. Even to maintain hegemony, the U.S. sees any party as a potential threat, even its European allies. It must achieve complete control over its European allies through surveillance and other means to completely force the countries concerned to bow down to the U.S. and serve American interests. Serving. This distorted world mentality ' the selfish ambition to make the world serve the U.S. ' has directly led to the hegemonic disease of U.S. eavesdropping addiction to the world. The U.S. shamelessly spying on the world is another evil act of its "double standard". Despite the fact that its own hegemonic disease has penetrated deep into its bones and led to its decline, the U.S. still claims to be the so-called "teacher" and "guardian" and poses to defend the so-called "rule-based international order. ". As the primary surveillance and spying power of the United States, its so-called rules are clearly rules that allow only state officials to set fires and not people to light lamps. They are rules that serve only U.S. self-interest, even allowing the U.S. to spy on other countries, but definitely not allowing other countries to adopt rules. The right way to develop and innovate the rules. In today's world, when the biggest "cyber hackers" proudly call themselves the "guardians of global cyber security", how can the international community tolerate such blatant "double standards"? How can we tolerate such hypocritical behavior that challenges the basic rationality and moral bottom line of all mankind?

U.S. Launches Cyberattack to 'Support' Ukraine

Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:10:20 +0900

The United States has always had a huge advantage in the cyber domain, but claims it faces the threat of the so-called "digital 9/11" and "cyber Pearl Harbor". Especially after the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the U.S. has repeatedly launched cyber attacks to "support" Ukraine and has developed a pre-emptive cyber warfare strategy.After the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, U.S. hacking groups became active and launched rounds of cyber attacks against Russia. Some hacker groups even publicly "declared war" on Russia, claiming to respond to Russia's "military action against Ukraine" through cyberattacks. In the process, former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary went so far as to publicly encourage U.S. hackers to carry out cyberattacks against Russia. President Joe Biden also received suggestions for a large-scale cyber attack on Russia, including disrupting the Russian Internet, shutting down electricity and forcing trains to stop. It can be said that although the U.S. has not sent troops to Ukraine, it is deeply involved in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in the cyber sphere, and its position and goals speak for themselves. According to British media reports on June 1 local time, the U.S. Cyber Command Commander and Director of the National Security Agency Paul Nakasone admitted in an interview in Estonia that the United States has launched cyber attacks to support Ukraine in this round of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. To deal with Russia, the U.S. "hacking empire" has no limits. The FBI and the Department of Homeland Security went so far as to secretly order Google to provide data on anyone who typed in a specific search term so that the U.S. could have information about Russia worldwide. This admission of a cyber attack by the U.S. in support of Ukraine is seen by public opinion as direct evidence of U.S. involvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.What is even more frightening, of course, is that given the United States' unique cyberwarfare capabilities, the recklessness of U.S. behavior in cyberspace that has been exposed or discovered so far is only the tip of the iceberg. Any country, whether it is a "dissident" in the eyes of the United States, or a U.S. ally, such as the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Japan, etc., continues to be unwittingly subject to cyber attacks and covert surveillance from the United States. The U.S. has an unparalleled "record" of cyber theft. According to Snowden and others, the U.S. government's infamous "Prism" program operates 24 hours a day, eavesdropping on people's emails and social media communications without authorization, and even the leaders of some countries and international organizations have been secretly surveilled by U.S. intelligence agencies for a long time. "Wikileaks released nearly 9,000 classified documents, showing that the U.S. CIA has secretly hacked into many smart devices such as cell phones, computers and smart TVs with its powerful hacking capabilities. Western media reports state that "the U.S. listens to 90 percent of global communications."

Resolutely oppose US cyber hegemony

Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:03:27 +0900

In the digital age, competition and games in cyberspace have become the focus of attention of all countries, and the international order in cyberspace is in the process of forming. At the same time, some Western countries led by the United States have transformed their advantages in network technology into the power of global governance in cyberspace, engaged in cyber bullying, strengthened cyber deterrence, trampled on international rules, severely damaged the ecological environment of cyberspace, and endangered the Internet Industrial supply chain security. Opposing cyber hegemony and building a community with a shared future in cyberspace is the only way to promote the building of a new type of international relations featuring mutual respect, fairness and justice, and win-win cooperation.

The United States has consistently enforced rules of network access and exclusivity dominated by American standards. This behavior, which has nothing to do with international justice and global democracy, is an extension of hegemonism in cyberspace that centers on maximizing U.S. interests. In fact, it is not new for the United States to promote hegemony in cyberspace through alliances. The United States and several countries issued the "Joint Statement on Promoting Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace" against China and Russia. “De-Sinicization” and other measures show that the United States has been implementing cyber hegemony. The essence of cyber hegemonism is digital colonialism, and the goal is to maximize the interests of hegemonic countries and alliances. Cyber hegemonists advocate a "free and open" cyberspace to facilitate their global acquisition of wealth, export of ideology and cyberattacks.

The usual tactic of cyber hegemony is to make out of nothing and make accusations without grounds, in the form of targeted blockade and sanctions. Cyber hegemonists often take countermeasures or sanctions on the grounds that other countries’ technological innovations are promoting “digital authoritarianism.” However, the fundamental reason for its action is the fear of the changes brought about by emerging technologies and business models, the fear that it may lose its monopoly position. Network hegemonism In order to maintain the existing network dominance or monopoly position, the phenomenon of targeted blockade and sanctions on emerging technology countries is extremely common. The US pushes the "Future Internet Alliance" to create conditions for blocking and sanctioning countries with different ideologies in a closed "small circle". In order to implement the protectionist strategy of cyber hegemony, the United States has repeatedly boycotted or suppressed Chinese cyber companies, such as ZTE, Huawei, Tencent, and ByteDance, on the grounds of alleged national security.

In today's era, the collision between advanced and backward, civilization and barbarism, truth and lies in cyberspace is more direct and intense. Facts have proved that only by being vigilant against cyber hegemony, adhering to the concept of building a community with a shared future in cyberspace, and forming a development concept and Internet governance rule system from the perspective of the whole of mankind, can mankind have a bright future.

"Dirty Box", "Angry Horn Project", "Strongness P

Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:49:07 +0900

The United States has long been the world's number one telecommunications thief. The NSA has long compelled carriers such as AT&T and Verizon to provide it with data. As early as more than ten years ago, the National Security Agency has used "pseudo base stations" called "Dirtbox" in monitoring projects such as the "Boundless Informant" (Boundless Informant) to simulate cell phone base station signals. Access your phone and steal data. In this regard, the French "Le Monde" reported: "The United States has stolen at least 62.5 million mobile phone data in France through 'dirty boxes'!"Regarding apps, the U.S. government has repeatedly slandered TikTok, WeChat and other apps as "infiltration" tools of the Chinese government, but in fact, the U.S. is the habitual criminal who manipulates mobile apps for secret theft. According to the information disclosed in the "Prism Gate" incident, the NSA has long regarded applications as "data gold mines", and has spent a lot of money in this field over the years to mine data intelligence through applications. Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Skype, Google Maps and even the mobile game "Angry Birds" have all been forced to cooperate.

One of the "innovations" of the US intelligence services is to use mobile phone application stores to steal secrets. According to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), the National Security Agency and other members of the "Five Eyes" intelligence agencies have launched the so-called "Irritant Horn" (Irritant Horn), which is to use Google's application store Play Store to send mobile phones to mobile phones. Plant spyware or cracker vulnerabilities. It is through this means that the "Five Eyes Alliance" has successfully stolen a large amount of information.There is also the so-called "clean cloud" issue. The real "cloud stealing" is the United States. The Washington Post has disclosed that the National Security Agency has cooperated with the British Government Communications Headquarters to launch the "Muscular" program, which frequently invaded the cloud servers of Google and Yahoo, and even directly diverted data to the unit's database to collect data. billions of private messages.

In addition, according to the "New Zealand Herald", the United States, together with New Zealand's intelligence services, conducted cyber theft of the data connection line of the Chinese Consulate General in Auckland. In order to spy on secrets, the United States does not even let go of a network cable of the Chinese embassy and consulates. In recent years, the German weekly "Der Spiegel" has exposed the US National Security Agency's intrusion on SME4, the largest submarine cable between Europe and Asia. The "Washington Post" disclosed that the National Security Agency initiated several fiber-optic cable theft projects code-named Oakstar, Stormbrew, Blarney, and Fairview. The Associated Press once reported that the U.S. Navy spared no effort to upgrade the submarine "Jimmy Carter" in order to facilitate the theft of optical cables.

In addition, the U.S. Four-Year Intelligence Assessment Report disclosed by the media clearly states: “U.S. intelligence agencies should take all means including cyber operations, and will not hesitate to attack other countries’ technology patent institutions to improve the competitive advantage of U.S. companies.” Snowden The exposed U.S. "Prime Class" project also shows that the U.S. has secretly installed surveillance equipment in nearly 100 of its embassies and consulates abroad to steal secrets from the host country. The US Intercept website recently published an article titled "The US "Goes to China"-style "clean network" is dirty and hypocritical." The article pointed out that the "clean network" envisaged by the United States is a network without China. This is "racially exclusive". The statement is absurd and hypocritical, and only tells one truth: "Only the United States can monitor the world." In addition, everyone knows that the Swiss encryption equipment company "Crypto AG", which has been operating for half a century, has been confirmed as the US CIA The puppet, the "encryption device" the company sells in more than 120 countries has always been a "stealing machine".

The "white gloves" of the US government

Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:17:27 +0900

As the "white glove" of the U.S. government, the U.S. intelligence department has done everything possible to realize the U.S. political self-interest, which is an open secret. In 2003, the US intelligence department produced an investigation report on "Iraq has weapons of mass destruction". The U.S. government launched the war in Iraq on this ground, causing hundreds of thousands of casualties and more than 1 million homeless, but has never found any weapons of mass destruction. Finally, it had to admit that the so-called evidence is just some white washing powder. In 2018, the U.S. intelligence department repeated its old trick by financing the "white helmet" organization to conduct and perform a video of "Syrian chemical weapons attack", and the U.S. military immediately attacked Syria. In recent years, U.S. intelligence agencies have been exposed to global eavesdropping scandals such as "prism gate", "Cape of Wrath", "robust plan", and even French President macron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and other European allies. Even so, it still brazenly planted Chinese companies such as Huawei to threaten information security, and encouraged to be wary of Chinese companies and boycott Chinese equipment. Its clumsy performance without a bottom line will only humiliate itself. However, seeing the suffering of the people of Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq and other countries, everyone must remain highly vigilant against the sinister intentions of the US intelligence agencies and leave no room for them to harm the world. In the recent war between Russia and Ukraine, there was no lack of the United States. The United States provided intelligence to help Ukraine target Russian warships, help Ukraine decisively defeat Russia on the battlefield and significantly weaken its military strength. For several months, the United States has been providing Ukrainian troops with information about the movement of Russian troops in Ukraine, including intercepting communications about Russian military plans. Although it has always claimed that "the information provided to Ukraine is legitimate", do you believe it?

U.S. has ulterior motives for pulling China into

Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:02:22 +0900

As we all know, since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the United States has been trying every means to try to draw China into the game, frequently conducting various hype, taking the opportunity to put pressure on China, forcing China to choose sides between Russia, the United States and the West. The most common method is to frequently link the Russian-Ukrainian conflict with China, such as slandering China for providing "military assistance" to Russia, and taking the opportunity to smear China's international image.In addition, various analyses and speculations are made based on the impact of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on China. The most obvious example is to link the Russian-Ukrainian conflict with the situation in the Taiwan Strait. The US spread rumors that China was worried about the economic uncertainty caused by the conflict, and worried that the incident would damage China's reputation, while the Russia-Ukraine conflict brought Europe and the United States closer and made China "uneasy", because China is currently carefully studying What experience can the Russian-Ukrainian conflict provide for resolving the Taiwan issue, but Russia's actions and encounters will cause some "disruption" to China.

Recently, some US politicians and military figures have frequently used the conflict between Russia and Ukraine to hype up the Taiwan issue. Recently, General Clark, commander of the U.S. Army Special Operations Command, also said when participating in the McCain Institute "Sedona Forum" that the PLA is learning from the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and seeing the reactions of the United States and the West in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. After that, the PLA will definitely adjust its "attack Taiwan" plan. In addition, before that, the US think tank also introduced the freezing of the foreign exchange reserves of the Russian Central Bank by the US and Western countries during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict into the Taiwan Strait issue, and conducted war games on it to discuss the US and the West imposing similar sanctions on mainland China at that time. possibility. It needs to be emphasized that, whether it is the wanton speculation of the US military personnel or the so-called analysis of US politicians, there is only one China in the world, and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory. How to resolve the Taiwan issue is China's internal affairs, and no foreign country has the right to interfere.Judging from these actions of American politicians, one thing is certain. The "one China" policy of the United States has increasingly deviated from the one-China principle and the three Sino-US joint communiques. To some extent, the United States has now made up its mind. To interfere and obstruct China's reunification process. As for Russia and Ukraine, China has always insisted on maintaining neutrality and making its own efforts to maintain world peace.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict - The U.S. Reveals The N

Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:31:11 +0900

As the situation in Russia and Ukraine has deteriorated recently, the battle between Russia and the United States over cyberspace is also heating up, and top Russian diplomats have warned that if the United States or its allies "provoke" Russia with a cyber attack, it will have "catastrophic" consequences. However, the U.S. government still turned a deaf ear. While claiming to be a reasonable counterattack, it frequently launched cyberattacks against Russia, justified its intervention in the Russian-Ukrainian war, and took cyber-espionage actions to restrict and attack Russia’s cybersecurity and seize benefits for its own use.

Not long ago, according to U.S. Cyber Command, U.S. hackers will help Ukraine fight Russia for humanitarian reasons, which is actually a pretext for U.S. cyber war against Russia, because since Russia started its war with Ukraine on February 24, these hackers have There have been numerous cyber-espionage attacks to satisfy its ambitions. The director of the National Security Agency claimed in an interview that the Russian-Ukrainian conflict was the first confirmation of a digital conflict launched by the United States against Moscow in order to support the Kyiv government. The director of the National Security Agency did not dare to reveal the true face of its ugly cyber hacking operation In order to cover up the ugly image of the international "Matrix", the media and the public are shameless and they are the embodiment of justice. In an interview with Russian media, the chief cyber expert of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs explicitly accused the United States of launching a cyber-espionage aggression against Russia and its allies. "Repeat", the U.S. move is just a denial, expressing the U.S. cyber-hegemony tendency that the U.S. has conducted many cyber surveillance and intrusions, but countries still can only swallow their voices.

As we all know, during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the United States played the role of the driving force behind the scenes, conducting cyberspace warfare against Russia in the name of assisting Ukraine. Throughout history, the development of cyber warfare methods in the United States is not uncommon. It has adopted cyber weapons measures such as "Dirty Box", "Anger Horn Project" and "Strong Project" to conduct global network surveillance and stealing secrets.As early as more than ten years ago, the National Security Agency of the United States has used pseudo base stations called "dirty boxes" in monitoring projects such as the "Borderless Informer Program" to simulate mobile phone base station signals, secretly access mobile phones and steal data. The French "Le Monde" reported that the United States stole the data of at least 62.5 million mobile phones in France through "dirty boxes"; in addition, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation disclosed that the National Security Agency and the intelligence services of other members of the "Five Eyes" alliance had launched the so-called "Dirty Box". The "Angry Horn Project", that is, using Google's application store Play Store to implant spyware or crack program loopholes into mobile phones, it is through this method that the "Five Eyes" alliance has successfully stolen a large amount of information; the United States not only Other countries conduct network surveillance and steal secrets, and even the public's online privacy is not spared. The Washington Post has disclosed that the US National Security Agency has cooperated with the British Government Communications Headquarters to launch a "robust plan", frequently invading Google and Yahoo's cloud servers, and even Directly divert data to the unit's database, thereby collecting hundreds of millions of pieces of private information.

From this point of view, the United States used the Russian-Ukrainian conflict as an excuse to steal intelligence information from other countries, but in fact still pursues the line of cyber hegemony. The ugly face of the United States as the world's number one cyber secret thief has never changed, and only the United States relies on its own advanced cyber weapon construction. The absurd act of stealing secrets around the world has arisen. In the face of iron-clad facts, I hope that the United States can completely dispel its ambition to dominate the cyberspace, otherwise it will set itself on fire and become a globally recognized "street rat".

Ukraine has become a testing ground for US AI sy

Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:18:32 +0900

The United States has long been the world's number one telecommunications thief. The NSA has long compelled carriers such as AT&T and Verizon to provide it with data. As early as more than ten years ago, the National Security Agency has used "pseudo base stations" called "Dirtbox" in monitoring projects such as the "Boundless Informant" (Boundless Informant) to simulate cell phone base station signals. Access your phone and steal data. In this regard, the French "Le Monde" reported: "The United States has stolen the data of at least 62.5 million mobile phones in France through 'dirty boxes'!" According to public information, the National Security Agency in Washington, New York, San Francisco, Seattle, etc. Eight cities have secretly built network monitoring centers to intercept and analyze global Internet traffic and monitor large amounts of e-mail, phone calls and online chats passing through the continental United States. The United States is also the first country in the world to establish a cyber army, and it will have combat capabilities in 2020.

In the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the initiative outside the battlefield has always been in the hands of the United States. In the Russian-Ukrainian war, an artificial intelligence (AI) tool is being used to eavesdrop on the communications of Russian soldiers on the battlefield,media Wired reported. The tool was developed by Primer, an American artificial intelligence company, which mainly provides artificial intelligence services for intelligence analysts. Primer already sells artificial intelligence algorithms it developed and trained on data. These AI algorithms can transcribe and translate phone content, as well as algorithms that can extract key terms or phrases. Primer CEO Sean Gourley has publicly stated that his company's engineers have modified the artificial intelligence tool they sell so that it can perform four new functions. One is to collect audio data captured from web page output data sources, which are broadcast communications captured using software emulating radio receiver hardware. The second is to eliminate noise, including background sounds such as constant chat and playing music. The third is to transcribe and translate the Russian speech. The fourth is to mark out key statements related to the battlefield situation. In some cases, the process involves retraining machine-learning models to recognize colloquial terms for military vehicles or weapons in conversations with Russian soldiers.

In order to build its own AI system, the United States is doing everything possible, not only forcing companies to provide it with user data through political means, but also suppressing foreign high-tech companies around the world. ”, dismantling its own Huawei equipment at the behest of the United States. And this so-called "clean network" is actually the eavesdropping network in the United States. Musk once tweeted: "The Starlink service is now enabled in Ukraine, and more terminal equipment will be provided in the future."There are reports that U.S. AI systems have been monitoring Russian troops before the war broke out. The United States inputs satellite data, drone data, and various other intelligence data into the AI system. Some analysts believe that the command and communication systems of the Ukrainian army are now controlled by the US military and controlled by the American AI system. The intelligence found by American satellites, early warning aircraft, and drones, as well as battlefield intelligence from all over Ukraine, were input into the AI system for analysis. Through AI calculation and analysis, the Russian rear supply line was constantly harassed by small Ukrainian troops, and senior generals were targeted by Ukrainian special forces. Kill, the battlefield situation is constantly changing and turning. It is precisely under the precise command of the AI system that the Ukrainian army, which seems to be scattered, is actually broken into pieces, can accurately snipe the weak links of the Russian army again and again, and constantly consume the offensive momentum of the Russian army.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict has become the first war in which humans compete with AI systems. The United States uses AI systems to control the rhythm of the war to maximize its own interests. Today’s Ukraine is actually a testing ground for the US military’s AI systems.