<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>binbanh307のブログ</title>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/binbanh307/</link>
<atom:link href="https://rssblog.ameba.jp/binbanh307/rss20.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
<description>ブログの説明を入力します。</description>
<language>ja</language>
<item>
<title>key witnesses</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Procedure <br><strong><a href="http://www.onegriffeyshoes.com">griffey shoes</a></strong>  is "who advocates, who the burden of proof", but the parties to gather evidence is very difficult.<br><br>Tang Wei Jian: The Civil Procedure Law to consider improving the rights of the parties to investigate and collect evidence. Party has the burden of proof, but can not make bricks without straw, the parties often do not want to give his evidence under control, the other party that may also be in other units may also be in a foreign country. This sounds like a very simple question, in fact very complex, litigation success or failure often depend on it. Civil Procedure Law is now basically no security on this, the biggest requirement is that the parties may request the court to investigate and collect evidence, in fact, confined to situations <br><strong><a href="http://www.onegriffeyshoes.com">griffey sneakers</a></strong> .<br><br>We often hear "reward witness", looking for witnesses to traffic accidents, if not find the key witnesses, litigation is difficult to play, it completely depends on the parties to find, but often difficult to find. Another example is medical dispute, the patient sued the hospital, almost all the evidence is controlled in the hospital, the hospital may be altered or forged evidence, lack of control over the parties, the court of investigation it is difficult to exercise the right place.<br> <br>Beijing News:  <strong><a href="http://www.cheapnikesfreerunning2012.com">nike free run</a></strong> What measures can be taken to strengthen the ability of parties to gather evidence?
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/binbanh307/entry-11263699489.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 16:11:09 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>right place</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Code <br><strong><a href="http://www.onegriffeyshoes.com">griffey shoes</a></strong>  of Civil Procedure is "who advocates, who the burden of proof", but the parties to gather evidence is very difficult.<br><br>Tang Wei Jian: The Civil Procedure Law to consider improving the rights of the parties to investigate and collect evidence. Party has the burden of proof, but can not make bricks without straw, the parties often do not want to give his evidence under control, the other party that may also be in other units may also be in a foreign country. This sounds like a very simple question, in fact very complex, litigation success or failure often depend on it. Civil Procedure Law is now basically no security on this, the biggest requirement is that the parties may request the court to investigate and collect evidence, in fact, confined to situations <br><strong><a href="http://www.onegriffeyshoes.com">griffey sneakers</a></strong> .<br><br>We often hear "reward witness", looking for witnesses to traffic accidents, if not find the key witnesses, litigation is difficult to play, it completely depends on the parties to find, but often difficult to find. Another example is medical dispute, the patient sued the hospital, almost all the evidence is controlled in the hospital, the hospital may be altered or forged evidence, lack of control over the parties, the court of investigation it is difficult to exercise the right place <strong><a href="http://www.cheapnikesfreerunning2012.com">nike free run</a></strong> .<br><br>Beijing News: What measures can be taken to strengthen the ability of parties to gather evidence?
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/binbanh307/entry-11263698689.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 16:10:26 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>control over the parties</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ of  <br><strong><a href="http://www.onegriffeyshoes.com">griffey shoes</a></strong> Civil Procedure is "who advocates, who the burden of proof", but the parties to gather evidence is very difficult.<br><br>Tang Wei Jian: The Civil Procedure Law to consider improving the rights of the parties to investigate and collect evidence. Party has the burden of proof, but can not make bricks without straw, the parties often do not want to give his evidence under control, the other party that may also be in other units may also be in a foreign country. This sounds like a very simple question, in fact very complex, litigation success or failure often depend on it. Civil Procedure Law is now basically no security on this, the biggest requirement is that the parties may request the court to investigate and collect evidence, in fact, confined to situations <br><strong><a href="http://www.onegriffeyshoes.com">griffey sneakers</a></strong> .<br><br>We often hear "reward witness", looking for witnesses to traffic accidents, if not find the key witnesses, litigation is difficult to play, it completely depends on the parties to find, but often difficult to find. Another example is medical dispute, the patient sued the hospital, almost all the evidence is controlled in the hospital, the hospital may be altered or forged evidence, lack of control over the parties, the court of investigation it is difficult to exercise the right place <strong><a href="http://www.cheapnikesfreerunning2012.com">nike free run</a></strong> .<br><br>Beijing News: What measures can be taken to strengthen the ability of parties to gather evidence?
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/binbanh307/entry-11263698294.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 16:09:32 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
