<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>臨床研究雑記帳</title>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/dukedevil/</link>
<atom:link href="https://rssblog.ameba.jp/dukedevil/rss20.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
<description>臨床研究を学ぶために渡米中。日々の学びを綴ります。</description>
<language>ja</language>
<item>
<title>Aortic Stenosis by Dr Robert O. Bonow</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>Bicuspid valveのdilatationの理由は物理的と分子メカニズム的の２つ;</p><ul><li>Wall share stress Circulation 2014 129 673</li><li>分子メカニズム</li></ul><p>AS進行のメカニズム</p><p>Risk factor for atherosclerosis was also risk factors for AS（JACC 2017 69 1523）</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>PET study ---- inflamationがASの進行に関連（Circulation 2012 125 76）</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>ASではLipoprotein associated phospholipase A2（LPA）がover expression</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>generic association with valvular calcification and AS (NEJM)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>elevatied lipoprotein and AS (from JACC)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>assocation of LPA</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>state of art paper about NHLBI working group for LPA and AS (JACC 2018 71 177-192)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>ASのreview paper （NEJM 2014 371 744）must read for fellows!!</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>circ CQO 2009 2 533 現在のsymptomatic ASの自然歴</p><p>asymptomatic severe ASの自然歴 circ 1997 95 2262, NEJM 2000 343 611-617, circ 2010 121 151-156</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>management challenges</p><ul><li>Asymptimatic severe AS</li><li>Low-flow, low-dradient AS</li><li>Indication of TAVR</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Asymptimatic severe AS</span></p><p>ACC/AHA</p><ul><li>Vmax &gt;5m class2a&nbsp;</li><li>Rapid progression and low surgical risk class2b</li></ul><p>ESC class 2a</p><ul><li>Vmax &gt;5,5</li><li>severe AS calc</li><li>elevated BNP (JACC 2014 83 2016-2025)</li><li>PH</li></ul><p>Exercise test results</p><ul><li>symptom: class1</li><li>hypotension: class 2a</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>How are "symptoms" detemined?</p><ul><li>Everyone has symptoms on stress test</li><li>Are the symptoms cardiac in origin?</li><li>What level of exercise?</li></ul><p>How is hypotension defined?</p><ul><li>less than 20 mmHg increase?</li></ul><p>ではsymptomaticになるまで待つか？</p><p>難しいのが突然死が96名中1名</p><p>ただしAVR後30日以内に死亡も6名</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Ann Throrac Surg 2006 82 116</p><p>JACC 2015 6 2827（Taniguchi et al）</p><p>AVR vs. conservative approach PS match → AVR</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Low-flow, low-dradient AS</span></p><p>Heart 2010 96 1463-1468</p><p>1/3はmean gradient &lt;40 and AVA &lt;1.0</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>treat hypertension</p><p>cadiac cath</p><p>valve calc</p><p>advanced imaging</p><p>clinical skill set</p><p>→ this scenario can be under-diagnosed and over-diagnosed</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Only if clinical anatomic and hemodynamic data support severe AS: class2a</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="font-weight:bold;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;">TAVR indication</span></span></p><p>heart team class 1</p><p>TAVR for prohbittive surgical risk class 1</p><p>TAVR or SAVR for high risk class 1</p><p>TAVR or SAVR for intermediate risk class 2a</p><p>SAVR for low risk class 1</p><p>TAVR for LV dysfunction --- waiting</p><p>TAVR for asymptomatic AS --- waiting</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Class 1 = should be performed, not must be done</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/dukedevil/entry-12348844088.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:57:50 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Competing risk</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>Competing riskに関してのreview paper。</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Wolbers M, Koller MT, Stel VS, et al. Competing risks analyses: objectives and approaches. Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 7;35(42):2936-41.</p>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/dukedevil/entry-12348651329.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:57:03 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Data collectionに関連した論文</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>Systematic Review and Meta Analysisの際に必要となるdata collectionに関連したtipsをまとめた論文。</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Li T, Vedula SS, Hadar N, et al. Innovations in data collection, management, and archiving for systematic reviews.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 17;162(4):287-94.</p>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/dukedevil/entry-12348647135.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:37:02 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Adjusted risk difference</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>論文の査読でadjusted odds ratioと合わせてadjusted risk differenceを求められることがあったので関連した論文を。</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Pedroza C, Thanh Truong VT. Performance of models for estimating absolute risk difference in multicenter trials with binary outcome. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):113.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Cheung YB. A modified least-squares regression approach to the estimation of risk difference. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(11):1337-44.</p>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/dukedevil/entry-12344073926.html</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 08:42:03 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>論文査読</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>論文の査読はトレーニング。</p><p>今年になってすでに３本。</p><p>だいたい平均2週間に1本くらいのペース。</p><p>上司×2がassociate editorとして送ってくるため、なかなか手を抜くことはできない。</p>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/dukedevil/entry-12343320424.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:46:11 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Decision Letter</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>正月早々、っと言っても今日からアメリカでは通常営業だけど、2つのdecision letterが届いた。</p><p>1つはacceptで、もう1つはmajor revision。</p><p>今回のacceptは自分の中での壁を1つ乗り越えた感じだな。</p><p>2018年は最高のスタートになった。</p><p>今年も頑張ろう。</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>それにしても、アメリカ人は働かないっていうのは嘘だと思う。</p><p>多分、上に行く人は、物凄く働いていると思うし、少なくとも自分の周りのcardiologyに関わっている人はworkaholicが多いように思う。やはり成功したければ、人一倍の努力が必要なんだろう。</p>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/dukedevil/entry-12341480146.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 15:26:05 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
