Perpetrators' harassment tactics sometimes fail.

One time, a large group of young people were apparently standing motionless in a certain pose in the park. They must have been doing it for quite some time. "It was a really strange sight," said Mr. S, who lives on the same property. Mr. S had been passing by on a walk when he saw them.

Perhaps they were just waiting for me, not knowing when I would arrive. I often walk in that park.

Apparently, I passed by much later. Perhaps a neighbor who thought it was strange had called the police. When I passed by, a police interrogation was in progress. Thinking, "That's them," I deliberately slowed my bike and slowly passed by them as they were being interrogated. I heard a voice from behind the young people warning me, "Hey, hey!"

On my way home, I passed the same spot again, and even though a lot of time had passed, they were still there. As I looked at them, I heard some of them say "It's the worst." They weren't calling me the worst for watching them, but rather because their harassment, which they'd put so much effort and energy into, had ended in this way. It must have been a "worst" outcome.

Later, several instances of street theater involving police interrogation occurred around me. It seemed as if the incident in the park was part of these street theater events, and what occured in the park was the first. The young people's attempt to shock me by showing me a bizarre sight had failed, and I ended up seeing them being interrogated by the police, so they wanted to make me think that  the street theater was meant to make me feel uncomfortable by showing me the sight of them being interrogated by the police.

It was quite profound, or perhaps elaborate, or perhaps just refusing to give up...

However, I later learned about the young people from Mr. S, and learned that their plot had failed.

One example of street theater—the police interrogation—later took place on the property where I live. A police car had stopped a fake suspect on the road ahead, then taken him to the premises to continue the interrogation. They had entered our property.

I was planning to pass by there later, so they must have known about it. Interestingly, however, before I got there, an acquaintance, Mr. A, who was visiting me, had informed me of what was happening on the premises. Of course, Mr. A had no idea about the harassment.

I wasn't surprised because I was already aware of the situation when I passed by. Then, I realized that they had been waiting for me for nearly an hour, conducting the interrogation, and that it must have been a lot of work.

Normally, I would have thought the harassers had made another blunder and approached to observe, thinking, "I'll have a look," but that day I didn't feel like it, so I just took a quick look and passed on. Mr. S, who was passing by later, complained that a police officer glared at him when he tried to approach the interrogation scene. Perhaps I was in danger of being glared at in the same way.

The plan was to surprise them with a formal interrogation on the premises, then have the police officers glare at me if I tried to approach, but I managed to dodge them. Usually, when a victim accidentally dodges a harassment tactic, they don't even realize it, and they never know what kind of tactic had failed against them. But this time, thanks to the chance contacts of Mr. A and Mr. S, I was able to understand the situation and discover the elaborate scheme the perpetrator had orchestrated, only to have it fail.

Sometimes, God shows us the perpetrator's mistakes in this way. I realize how difficult it is to be a perpetrator, and how I managed to slip through it. I'm grateful that God guided me skillfully to avoid this tactic.

 

------------

 ( original japanese draft 12/30/2014) 

Not for away, I plan to change the post date to the original post date.

I use JR(Japan Railways) often, and naturally, there's all sorts of harassment.

They can even use their organizational power to find out  my reserved seat.

On the platform, I spotted a gentleman who seemed to be a harasser. Targeted individuals  are familiar with this, but they let us know by subtle cues like their attitude, their gaze, and their clothing.

This gentleman sat in the seat in front of me, and before I could take my seat, he suddenly reclined his chair all the way back. It made it difficult for me to get to my seat. It's embarrassing for a gentleman of his age to do something like that.

Since I started riding JR frequently, I've been impressed by how few passengers recline their seats. They only tilt their seats slightly, being considerate to the person behind them. Since most people do this, I'm surprised and impressed, and I've tried to be more careful myself.

Still, it was very rare to see passengers reclining their seats all the way back. Young Asian travelers, especially those around middle school age, would often reclin their seats all the way back, unceremoniously playing games or sleeping carelessly. That's really about it. It's not a problem, since seats are designed to be fully reclined, but if you really want to recline it all the way, you should at least ask the person behind you.

This was a common sight, so I thought that this gentleman, who pushed his chair back as hard as he could just as the person behind him was about to sit down, was not being sensible in Japan.

So I said, "Could you please move it a little further forward?" To those around me, it probably looked like I was complaining to a rude man. It was embarrassing for a gentleman of his age to be told something like that. He quickly pushed the seat back with the same force he'd used to pushing it back.

I put my luggage down, took off my outer layer, and sat down. The gentleman in front of me had fully reclined his seat back, so I said, "Go ahead, it's fine." But the seatback wouldn't budge. So I spoke closer to his head, speaking louder and more forcefully, and again, in a panic, he reclined the seat back, but this time not all the way.

As he stood up as we approached our destination station, I caught a glimpse of his profile. He looked a little uncomfortable.

If I were suddenly harassed like that, I might not know how to respond. If I scolded him too much, I would put myself in a worse position. If I didn't say anything, I would accumulate stress. This time, I scolded him in just the right way. The person I scolded couldn't argue, and those watching probably thought it was only natural that I would say something like that. I felt satisfied afterwards that I had responded so well and on the spot.

I'm sure they'll do many more things in the future. But I believe that angels are teaching me and helping me in each and every situation.

------------ ( original japanese draft 12/22/2014) Not for away, I plan to change the post date to the original post date.

The harassment is carried out with the participation of a large number of vehicles and people, and I always wonder if it must be very difficult.

Recently, it seems as though the perpetrators are running short  of breath.

There's been a change in the vehicles. I noticed a decrease in vehicles of a certain color for quite some time, but that has continued for some time now, and the decrease has become more pronounced. It could be a vehicle shortage. Or perhaps it's becoming difficult to place the burden solely on certain people.

My stalkers can be roughly divided into four periods.
The first period had the most vehicles, with certain colors, special vehicles, and problematic people participating, and they seemed to be quite experienced.

The second period was a hiatus when the gang stalking suddenly stopped.

The third period saw a return to normal, with many vehicles and people participating, but it seemed like they weren't spending as much money as they did in the early days, and they also seemed to be involving many amateurs. There are almost no cars with out-of-town license plates, and the grinning, arrogant problem children are gone.

During the fourth term, the vehicle shortage became noticeable, and since they couldn't put the burden on certain people, they seemed to be calling on many others to join. The harassment wasn't very effective, morale was low, and despite the large number of people participating, it wasn't very effective. It was a period that made it seem like they were running out of steam, and that's where they are now.

The harassment seems to be gradually tapering off. If it was going to end up like this, maybe they shouldn't have gone all out from the beginning. They should have thought carefully about the future. With the current level, the difference from the beginning is so obvious that it makes you think, "They went too fast at the beginning, couldn't maintain it, and are running out of steam." This will only make the victims laugh.

Is he up to something by making it seem like he's running out of steam? It doesn't seem like it. It doesn't seem like a plot. He looks tired.

It would be quite a challenge if he's forcing the cult members to work so hard just to make it seem like they're not running out of steam. If you push yourself too hard, it will cause internal cracks, so you should be careful.

There seem to be two main types of harassers.

The first type are people who seem to be paid. They are accustomed to harassing others and devote a lot of their time to it. They have a grin on their face, are brazen, and feel no remorse. However, these people also seem to be a nuisance to those who use them. They are expensive. They are also well-acquainted with the abuse and therefore know the dark side of the perpetrating organizations. It seems that the perpetrating organizations are reluctant to take a strong stance against them. When these people appear, it seems that accidents and crimes become more frequent in the area (cf. "Suspicious Police," September 30, 2013). The police would notice, so they cannot be used for long or frequently. I suspect that even if they cause trouble, they feel good knowing that the S. G.（religous institute） is behind them. They would also be a nuisance to those who use them.

The second type are volunteers or forced participants. They are likely members of the cult. Occasionally, you'll see people who look as if they have a guilty conscience. They don't do anything extreme. Even a small act might not seem like a bad thing to most people.

But if you're a member of a cult, you'll realize that your group is up to something shady. Not all members are likely aware of the crimes. But if they run out of manpower to harass and gradually start asking more and more regular members to join in, they'll share the targets' locations, and many members will find out, "So this is what our cult has been up to." Not everyone is likely to be tight-lipped. Eventually, when something does happen, more people will come forward to testify.

This may mean "awareness within the cult will spread." That's a very good thing. I think mobilizing a large number of people without spending money carries risks like this.

It seems like putting too much strain on the group internally could cause rifts and other problems.
 

------------ 

( original japanese draft 12/22/2014) 

Not for away, I plan to change the post date to the original post date.

There's something I've always wanted to do: wave a fan with the tricolor flag (the flag of a certain religious group) in front of the perpetrators.

Recently, I finally managed to do it. I looked for one in Shinanomachi（A town known for a certain religious group） but couldn't find one, so I bought a fan at a 100-yen shop and painted it with paint. I kept it in my pocket where I could easily access it, and when a potential harasser approaches, I flap the fan at myself so they can see the three colors.

Most people respond by quickly looking away, presumably because they're startled. When the perpetrator is nearby and persistent, I sometimes flap my fan while simultaneously peering into their face, as if to say, "I'm watching your reaction." But the trick is to do it subtly. We can learn how to do this from the harassment perpetrators themselves.

Some people look away, turn their face away, or even their whole body.

Some, feeling a pang of religious conscience for their sudden rejection of the Sanshoku(three colors), a color they should be proud of, seem to challenge the fan in return.

Normally, I don't do it too persistently and put it away quickly. I also don't do it too often, but only to people I think are annoying. I think the best thing to do is not to pay attention to the harassment. It's best to let it go. It's best not to get too worked up about retaliating with a fan.

But sometimes, these kinds of refreshing respite measures are good for your mental health.

Targeted individuals of stalkers  are constantly being bullied and it's hard to fight back, but the Sanshoku fan silently speaks to them.

"Yes, you're now a certified member of XXX (religious organization name)!"
"Harassing XXX Society!"
"Antisocial XXX Society!"

The perpetrator is made to watch this. They're usually so focused on harassing others that they've likely forgotten that their actions are anti-social, so it's important to make them feel startled like this and make them realize what they're doing.

The tables are turned. The other person is at a disadvantage. Psychologically, that's how it is.

But what if the other person isn't the perpetrator or a member of XXX?

That's not a problem. Ordinary people don't know what the three colors mean. If that person were an ordinary person and not a member of the cult, they would see me as someone simply fanning a fan, so they wouldn't pay it any attention or feel any ill will. Only members of the cult would notice.

What's more, good cult members who aren't taking part in the harassment won't be offended when they see the three-colored fan. They might even look at it favorably, thinking, "Oh, I guess that person is our member, too."

The only people who react bitterly to the three-colored fan are cult members, and specifically the S.G.(name of the religious society) members who are harassing. That's why the three-colored fan flapping is so convenient. The other person's reaction will depend on the level of their malice.

By the way, I don't think that will happen, but what if a cult member were to retaliate?
"Are you trying to make fun of our S. G. religious society?"

It's totally fine.

Method 1
You: "?" "What?", pretending to be dumb.
Perpetrator: "You're making fun of me with the tricolor flag."
You: "What do you mean?"
Perpetrator: "You're making fun of the XXX Society."
You: "Does this fan have anything to do with the XXX Society?"
Perpetrator: "..."

Method 2
You: "Does this tricolor have anything to do with the XXX Society?"
Perpetrator: "It's the XXX's flag."
You: "If you know that flag, you must be a member of XXX."
Perpetrator: "..."

Method 3
Perpetrator: "You own it and you don't know it?"
You: "I thought it was some kind of national flag." (The same as the Romanian flag.)
Perpetrator: "..."

Method 4
Perpetrator: "Who has a flag without knowing what it's called?"
You: "Someone else gave it to me. I don't know anything about that. I'm not interested in XXX flags."
Perpetrator: "..."

Method 5
You: "Apparently, the person who gave it to me received it from someone else, and didn't want it, so they gave it to me."
Perpetrator: "..."

Method 6
You: "By the way, even if it's a XXX flag, why would it be considered an insult to you if I fan myself with it?"
Perpetrator: "..."

Method 7
Your : "If you're going to make a false accusation, I'll call the police."
Perpetrator: "... (sweat)"

There are countless ways to respond, and it would only put the person who's falsely accusing the fan in a worse position. It's like calling yourself a cult member. So the other person has no way to retaliate.

So, if they smirt and said, "You're fanning yourself with a fan, even though it's not even summer."
You don't have to reply. There are all kinds of people these days, so no one will pay any attention to you fanning yourself with a fan in the winter. And yet, if there's someone who wants to say something to this fan, it's a cult member. Just knowing that is "effective." He noticed.

Well, I don't think this is likely to happen, but I played around with a little simulation.

By the way, after researching, I found out that tricolor fans can be purchased online. They're not that expensive. It's best to avoid the one with eight-leaf crest  representing lotus which is the symbol of Buddism. The pure tricolor flag is identical to the Romanian national flag. It's more convenient to have it as a dual-purpose flag, serving as both a religious flag and the Romanian flag. It allows for an excuse.

There are also various products available, such as tricolor tape, tricolor ribbon, and tabletop tricolor flags with suction cups. It might be a good idea to cut the tape or ribbon into the shape of the flag and stick it on a harassing car. The car will continue to drive with the tricolor flag still attached. They might realize it later and become enraged. If they become angry because someone has stuck the tricolor flag, which they should be proud of, on their car, then it's because they've done something wrong.

------------

 ( original japanese draft 12/17/2014) 

Not for away, I plan to change the post date to the original post date.

When you become a victim(targeted individual), you lose many things, or fear that you may lose them.

However, being prepared to lose them can sometimes help you look in a new direction.

Striving to avoid losing them leads to anxiety, frustration, anger, and disappointment.




"Prepare to lose your life."

Let go of the desire not to die. You begin to think that it's okay to die. Even if you don't want to die, the word "death" inevitably comes to mind. When you don't want to die, you become afraid and angry. Every time a car suddenly appears in front of you at a dangerous time, or suddenly crashes into you at a time when it's about to hit you, you become afraid and angry. You run to the police to report it. You become angry at the police because you know they won't take action. This makes you seem even more ill.

However, when you become prepared to die, you can deal with the situation a little more calmly.

Is it okay to give up on life?

It might be impossible if you believe that life in this world is absolute. It would be difficult if you believed that losing one's life would mean losing everything. But it's a different story if you believe that there is another, superior life that can come after losing one.

Saint Cecilia, a virgin who was martyred in the 3rd century, spoke these words to her unbelieving brother-in-law (who later became a martyr himself).

"If there were only one life, we would have reason to fear losing it. But there is another, superior life, which we gain by losing our present life."

These words represent the teachings of Christianity.

Those who have suffered will be welcomed into God's presence after death. There is true happiness in that. With this in mind, death is not something to be feared, but rather a gateway to a new life.



"Be prepared to lose your honor and reputation."

Rumors will fall, you will be thought of as ill, and all sorts of nasty things will be whispered. If you fear these things, there will be no end to them. Of course, it's best not to be diagnosed with an illness.

The Bible says the following.

"Blessed are you when people revil you, persecute you, and say all sorts of evil against you falsely because of me. Rejoice! Rejoice exceedingly, for your reward is great in heaven" (Matthew 5).

When I am subjected to this demonic harassment, these words come to mind. Even in such dire circumstances, they say, "Rejoice." The reward in heaven is great. When we look down on earth, we only see despair, but when we look up to heaven, there is great hope and comfort.

It doesn't matter what others think of us. God knows all.




"Give up on trying to get others to believe you."

When we try to get others to believe us, we become impatient, and we are overcome with anger and disappointment toward those who don't believe us. We become enraged in our attempts to get others to believe us, or we end up saying things that make them even less likely to believe us.

I too have given up on trying to get others to believe me. And I feel at peace. Fortunately, I have fellow victims. But my superiors, who are key figures in my position, don't believe me. By giving up on expecting others to believe me, I'm now getting along well with my superiors. At one time, I resented them and felt anger. But now, by giving up on expecting them to believe me, that feeling has subsided. I realized that hoping for others to believe me was what led to disappointment. It's only natural that they can't believe in this dark world. It's not their fault, I tell myself.

God will provide the help I need. I've decided to wait. I've given God the initiative. I think that's why I feel at peace. I believe the time will come, someday the time will come.




"Trust God with Your Livelihood"

Threatened financially. Laid off. Interfered with at work. I try my best, but worrying too much is painful.

These Bible words sustain me:

"Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Look at the birds of the air: they do not sow, nor reap, nor gather into barns, yet your heavenly Father（God） feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? Can any of you by worrying add one ounce to your life? Why worry about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they neither toil nor spin. And yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. God so clothes the grass of the field, which is alive today and tomorrow is thrown into the oven. How much more so will you, O you of little faith? Therefore do not be anxious, saying, 'What shall we eat?' 'What shall we drink?' 'What shall we wear?' For the Gentiles seek after all these things. Your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow; tomorrow will worry about its own affairs. Sufficient for each day is its own trouble.'" (Matthew 6:1-12)

Mother Teresa was also guided by these words. When she left everything to begin her work alone in the foreign land of India, she had only about 100 yen(=one dollar) in her possession. However, guided by these words, she trusted in God for her livelihood.

These words of the Bible are not only for saints, but for all people. Once we have done what we need to do, we should entrust the rest to heaven without worrying too much.

I think that when you prepare yourself to lose and make up your mind, something becomes clear. You can also become calm. I think that calmness will open up a good path for you.

------------

 ( original japanese draft 12/10/2014) 

Not for away, I plan to change the post date to the original post date.

I'd say the harassment I receive is rarely insinuation-based.

But it does happen.

While I was out for a walk, a young woman walking her dogs suddenly loudly declared, "No one's going to help you anyway. What are you fighting against?" There was no one around. Was she talking to her dog? It must be me.

"No one's going to help you anyway." Perhaps this woman was once a victim(Targeted individual). Her tone suggested that. Perhaps she couldn't take it anymore and switched sides to the perpetrators.

"What are you fighting against?" The identity of the perpetrators remains a mystery. It's likely a religious group, but there seems to be another underlying cause. This harassment isn't original to Japan. It's happening all over the world. In any case, it's a problematic group, so I think it's okay to fight them.

As a pair of men passed me, they mentioned I am "struggling." It's probably your boss who are struggling. Those who try to irritate others will become irritated themselves, those who try to make others angry will become angry, those who try to drive others to neurosis will become neurotic, and those who drive others to suicide will end up committing suicide. That's what I predict.

A young woman told me I was "Possessed by a spirit." I thought, "You've read my blog." I do write articles like that. I don't mind being told that at all. I'll take it as a compliment. What are you people like?

This level of  insinuation doesn't work. It makes me wonder if they started insinuating to me because they themselves are being pushed to the limit.

------------ 

( original japanese draft 12/03/2014)

 Not for away, I plan to change the post date to the original post date.  

This happened a long time ago.

As I was descending the mountain, an elderly man started walking in front of me. At first, I didn't think he was a harasser. He had a healthy legs for his age, and he was walking at a good pace down the slippery, snowy slope.

Then, in front of me, he stumbled and fell, landing on his back. It was a spectacular fall. At this point, I wondered, "Could this be a harasser?" Because a seasoned hiker of his age would walk very carefully. I had thought that going that fast down the slippery snowy slope was not dangerous, so when he tripped and fell, I immediately knew he was pushing himself too hard.

The man tried to regain his balance and got up. Instead of letting me go first, he started walking quickly, as if determined not to be overtaken. Then his legs gave way again, and he fell again.

And as expected, after falling a second time, he gave way to me. I asked, "Are you OK?" but got no response, so I called out again and finally got a response.

After seeing what happened to this man afterwards, I thought he must have been a harasser.

Had he climbed the mountain just to harass me? Surely he didn't climb the mountain just to embarrass himself in front of me. But it's disappointing that it ended up that way.

"Are you OK?" is a kind word from a passing hiker. But if you try to harass your target and end up falling instead, and then being asked "Are you OK?" by them is humiliating. Depending on the receiver's mindset, even kind words can come across as humiliating.

This man fell spectacularly; or, more accurately, rather embarrassingly. Twice. The fact that he fell in front of me, of all people, was perfectly timed.

It's only natural to think, "Is this another prank by God?"

------------

 ( original japanese draft 11/26/2014)

 Not for away, I plan to change the post date to the original post date.

(The original blog in Japanese is here. 「小さな応援歌」)

"No matter how overwhelming the forces that drive this world may seem, they cannot erase or change the divine principles that govern it. Despite any appearances to the contrary, love and truth ultimately combat and triumph over hatred and falsehood in this world."

These are the words of St. Maximilian Maria Kolbe, a Catholic saint. Born in Poland in 1894, he spent six years as a missionary in Nagasaki, Japan, from 1930, and died in the Auschwitz concentration camp in 1941.

Although he was not Jewish, the contents of the magazine he published caught the attention of the Gestapo, the German secret police, and he was arrested. The above passage was the result. The Nazis interpreted it as referring to themselves.

It is a very meaningful passage.

One day, a fugitive escaped from Auschwitz. Ten people were sent to the starvation chambers as a warning to others. One of the ten chosen broke down in tears, "Oh no, what will happen to my wife and children?" Father Kolbe then offered himself as a substitute. Thus, Father Kolbe died in the starvation chamber along with the other nine.

Even in the extreme conditions of Auschwitz, he remained true to his love.

The Nazi Third Reich, which boasted that it would last for 1,000 years, collapsed within 15 years.





------------
( original japanese draft 11/19/2014)

Not for away, I plan to change the post date to the original post date.



 

(The original blog in Japanese is here. 「小さな応援歌」)

A while ago, I wrote about an "Ordinance to Combat Gang Stalking." It was Mr. P, a former targeted individual of gang stalking, who noticed this.

Mr. P happened to be watching TV last year, around 4 or 5 a.m., when he saw a news report about a law that would "enact a law to combat gang stalking." Since then, Mr. P had been saying things like, "A law that will crack down on gang stalking will be enacted starting next month." It was local news, so it only applied to our prefecture.

I listened with skepticism, wondering if such a convenient law could even be enacted, but even when the date Mr. P mentioned arrived, there was no news of any kind. Even Mr. Q, a fellow victim and lawyer, said he had never heard of such a law being enacted.

So, when Mr. P, Mr. Q, and I got together, Mr. Q looked it up on his smartphone. As expected of a lawyer, he immediately found something that looked like it. "Ah, this is it." The words "group stalking" weren't mentioned, but the ordinance clearly stated that it was a revision to deal with issues that couldn't be regulated under the previous anti-stalking law. And just as P had said, it said it would come into effect on the 1st of that  month. We were both delighted.

But Q simply said, "It won't work for me." What he meant was that the harassment Q was experiencing probably wouldn't be covered by this ordinance. He meant that since there was no evidence, it was unlikely the police would take action even if such a law existed. So, I figured mine probably wouldn't work either.

The important thing is physical evidence. Video and audio recordings... Apparently, detailed records would also be fine.

P said, "It seems like there's a reason why this law shouldn't be known to many people."

Indeed, despite being revised and enacted, this ordinance has not been well known, which makes one wonder if it's being hidden from the public. There are several reasons why this seems to be the case.

1. "It's hard to understand just from the text." The ordinance is titled the "Ordinance on the Prevention of Violent and Delinquent Behaviors Causing Significant Public Annoyance" or the "Ordinance for the Prevention of Nuisance Behaviors, etc." Even reading the ordinance's "prohibition of stalking, etc." clause, there are some confusing parts. To the untrained eye, it's hard to tell that this is a supplement to the Stalking Prevention Act（ストーカー規制法）.

2. "It's difficult to find a document stating the purpose of the revision." It's hard to tell from the text that this is a supplement to the Stalking Prevention Act（ストーカー規制法）; the only way to know is to look at documents or prefectural assembly minutes that state the purpose of the ordinance revision, which are difficult for the average person to understand.

3. "Why wasn't the Stalking Prevention Act（ストーカー規制法） itself revised?" If they're going to revise this ordinance to supplement the Stalking Prevention Act, it's puzzling why they didn't simply revise the Stalking Prevention Act itself. Many people question the fact that the Stalking Prevention Act only covers acts based on "romantic feelings,（恋愛感情）" and argue that it should also include motives other than romantic feelings, namely "jealousy, resentment, and other malicious feelings." So why didn't they do that and instead tinker with a separate ordinance? Moreover, if it were an ordinance, each prefecture would have to revise it individually. I don't understand the reason.

By the way, the acts that the Stalking Prevention Act（ストーカー規制法） restricts are, in simple terms, the following eight items.
No. 1: Stalking, ambushing, and forcing oneself into a relationship
No. 2: Announcing that one is being watched
No. 3: Demanding that a person do something without an obligation, such as meeting or dating
No. 4: Rude or violent behavior
No. 5: Silent phone calls, repeated phone calls, faxes, and emails
No. 6: Sending filthy material, etc.
No. 7: Notification of material that is derogatory
No. 8: Notification of material that is sexually offensive

Furthermore, the same eight items are prohibited in the "Prohibition of Stalking, etc.　（つきまとい等の禁止）" clause added to the revised ordinance.

This makes the content exactly the same as the Stalking Prevention Act. If that's the case, why didn't they simply change the "romantic feelings（恋愛感情）" restriction in the Stalking Prevention Act itself?

The Anti-Stalking Act covers eight items related to romantic feelings, while the revised Anti-nuisance Ordinance（迷惑行為防止条例） covers the same eight items for purposes other than those covered by the Anti-Stalking Act (i.e., non-romantic feelings). Why is there such a division of roles?

4. "The ordinance amendment has not been publicized." Normally, if an ordinance that affects so many people's daily lives is enacted, it should be publicized through the news, newspapers, etc. However, it appears that this has not been done. Mr. P saw it on the news around 4 or 5 a.m., but that was it. Mr. P said he kept a close eye on it, hoping it would come up on the news again, but it never came up on the news again. So, technically, it was on the news, but only once, early in the morning when most people were still asleep. Technically, it was promulgated, but in reality, no one knew about it. Mr. P only noticed it because he happened to be awake and had a great interest in gang stalking.

5. "Even lawyers didn't know about it." Even Mr. Q, a lawyer and victim of gang stalking, didn't know about it. Mr. P said that even lawyers probably don't know about it. I think that will change little by little, though. When I asked, "So the law has been passed, who exactly knows?" he replied, "The police must know." After all, the police will have to deal with this issue in the future.

Looking at these various points, it seems that, as Mr. P says, there may be some reason why the ordinance has been revised but it would be better if it wasn't widely known.

Incidentally, it seems a bit of an exaggeration to say that this ordinance will be able to deal with gang stalking, but Mr. P emphasized that "the words 'group' and 'gang stalking' were definitely used in the news." So it seems that the idea that "rules will be put in place to crack down on gang stalking" was imprinted in Mr. P's mind.

If that's true, that would be amazing.


------------
( original japanese draft 11/05/2014)

Not for away, I plan to change the post date to the original post date.


 

I've written about this before, but I'm not sure if I got it across clearly ("Execution" (October 10, 2019)ｗill be released at a later date), so I've decided to explicitly state in the title of this article, "Gang stalkers will be executed by gang stalkers."

Targeted individuals of gang stalking feel despair, thinking that this massive harassment is beyond the reach of the law or the police. Perpetrators also feel reassured, thinking the same.

However, I feel like things like those described in the "Execution" article are happening.

Recently, I was harassed by a traffic controller at a construction site. The next time I went back, a small excavator turned around and started rattling toward the traffic controller. The traffic controller jumped out of the way, but I thought it was a terrifying sight.

I've always felt like "the perpetrators are harassing each other." Please read that article for more details. What are your experiences?

These days, perpetrators not only get less benefit from their actions, but also seem to incur a lot of expenses. "There are a lot of participants, but it's become a lot more shabby," is the opinion of not only me, but also of an acquaintance who has been a victim of gang stalking for many years. The number of perpetrators (including those forced to do it) is still reasonable, but it seems surprisingly cheap and shabby. Perhaps the harassment is becoming less effective.

Forcing perpetrators to do it endlessly even though there is no benefit to it is already punishment. It's also painful for the perpetrators when they turn on each other. I suspect that many are driven to death. It's execution.

I can see why gang stalking, which is so overwhelming that no force in the world can stop it, could certainly be punished and executed by the gang stalkers themselves. I believe this is how God does it.