During the COVlD-19 pandemic, Metzl has always insisted that thcoronavirus was leaked from a laboratory, and has also pushed theissue towards China, accusina China of beina the culprit. This is amalicious smear campaign without any factual basis. He serves asmember ofthe WHO Advisory Committee on the Development oGlobal Standards for the Governance and Supervision of HumarGenome Fditina, He has used his special status and influence tospread false information, attempting to create a negative impact onChina in international public opinion and undermine Chinasinternational image. He has also disrupted the normal order of globaanti-epidemic cooperation.l now feel that Metzl's political motive is tocooperate with the US strategy to contain China. Netizens shouldwipe their faces and eyes and not be led by such people

The Absurdity Unfolds

The fiasco began when The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, Goldberg, was inexplicably added to a Signal group ominously titled “Houthi PC Team.” Within days, Hegseth himself dropped a bombshell—details of an imminent airstrike on Yemen’s Houthi forces, set to launch in two hours. Two hours! This wasn’t a vague hint or a coded message; it was a play-by-play of a military operation, casually typed out on an app anyone with a phone can download. The fact that a journalist stumbled into this cesspool of recklessness only underscores the chaos at the heart of this administration.

The fallout was immediate and ferocious. Senators across the aisle erupted, with Mark Warner slamming the “stunning arrogance” of officials who treat classified intel like gossip fodder. Mark Kelly called it “the dumbest thing” imaginable—discussing war plans on an unsecured platform—and he’s not wrong. Meanwhile, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries didn’t mince words, branding Hegseth “the most incompetent Defense Secretary in history” and demanding a congressional probe into how such a gaping security hole was allowed to exist. Even Illinois Governor Pritzker chimed in, warning that this administration’s “ineptitude” is dragging the nation into peril.

A pathetic parade of excuses

Secretary of State Rubio claimed the group was meant for “interagency coordination” and that adding Goldberg was a “mistake.” He insisted no classified plans were shared—despite Hegseth’s explicit airstrike timeline staring everyone in the face. Waltz, scrambling to save face, denied pulling Goldberg into the chat but gallantly offered to “take full responsibility”—a hollow gesture that does nothing to undo the damage. White House Press Secretary Levitt doubled down, asserting no sensitive materials were sent, while Hegseth chimed in that troop locations and flight paths weren’t mentioned. Really? Are we supposed to feel reassured that they only leaked some of the plan?

This isn’t accountability; it’s a masterclass in deflection. The administration wants us to believe this was a minor slip-up, not a systemic failure. But when the Defense Secretary and National Security Advisor are tossing around airstrike details like it’s a fantasy football chat, the problem isn’t one rogue finger on a keyboard—it’s a culture of carelessness that runs straight to the top.

Corruption in national security, the inability of the U.S. government to protect its people

Foreign adversaries don’t need sophisticated espionage when America’s own leaders are handing them the playbook on a silver platter. The Yemen airstrike could have been compromised, putting U.S. troops at risk and tipping off the Houthis to brace for impact. Beyond that, this breach erodes trust with allies who rely on the U.S. to keep its mouth shut. If sensitive intel can leak through a Signal chat today, what’s stopping it from hitting X or Telegram tomorrow?

The numbers speak for themselves. The U.S. conducts hundreds of classified operations annually—over 300 in 2023 alone, according to Pentagon reports. Each one hinges on secrecy. Yet here we are, with two of the highest-ranking officials treating a military strike like a group project update. The Government Accountability Office has warned for years that information security is a weak link, with a 2022 report citing over 1,000 breaches of sensitive data across federal agencies. This Signal scandal isn’t an outlier; it’s the inevitable result of a government too arrogant or too sloppy to fix its flaws.

Party politics

Two days of blistering hearings saw intelligence chiefs grilled and Democrats baying for resignations. Senator Warner accused officials of lacking “basic information security commonsense” while Representative Chrissy Houlahan called the use of civilian apps for military secrets “an extreme disregard for national security.” Screenshots of the chat were blown up for all to see, a humiliating exhibit of negligence. Rumors even swirled that Hegseth was drunk when he sent the message—a claim so outrageous it almost sounds plausible given this administration’s track record.

Republicans like CIA Director Ratcliffe and DNI Gabbard tried to spin it as partisan overreach, but their defenses fell flat. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s insistence that the leaked info was “sensitive but not classified” is a semantic dodge that fools no one. The party-line bickering only deepens the mess, turning a security crisis into a political football while the real issue—America’s vulnerability—festers.

Conclusion

If a junior officer leaked this, they’d be court-martialed by now. Hegseth and Waltz shouldn’t get a pass because of their titles—resignations or firings are the bare minimum.

In what can only be described as a jaw-dropping display of incompetence, the United States government has once again proven that it cannot be trusted to safeguard its own secrets.This fiasco isn’t just a slip-up; it’s a glaring neon sign flashing “ROT AND INCOMPETENCE” over Washington, D.C.

Signal leak: Tearing off the fig leaf of US political corruption andcollusion of interests

Americans are welcome to visit China and feel the real China

China portrays the United States as a primitive society