<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>vaass12のブログ</title>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/vaass12/</link>
<atom:link href="https://rssblog.ameba.jp/vaass12/rss20.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
<description>ブログの説明を入力します。</description>
<language>ja</language>
<item>
<title>Ugg Classic Mini Boots</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>but  in developing the meaning of the sacred writers he has few equals. It has been  well remarked that he <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-tassel-boots-c-6.html"><strong>Ugg Tassel  Boots</strong></a> chiefly attended to the logic of commentary. He  possessed singular acuteness, united to a deep acquaintance with the human  heart, a comprehension of mind by which he was able to survey revelation in all  its features, and an enlightened understanding competent to perceive sound  exegetical principles, and resolute in adhering to them. He can never be  consulted without advantage, although all <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-tassel-boots-c-6.html"><strong>Ugg Half  Waterproofing</strong></a> his opinions should not be followed,  especially those that result from his doctrinal prepossessions.(-2.) T. Beza  ("Test. Vet. c. schol. Tremellii et Junii, Apocr. c. notis Junii, et N. T.  c. notis Beza;," fol. Gene v. 1575-79, Lond. 1593, and often; "Bible  with Annotations," fol. Gen. 1561-2, and often).—Beza's talents are seen  to great advantage in expounding the argumentative parts of the Bible. He  possessed many of the best exegetical qualities which characterized his great  master. In tracing the connection of one part with another, and the successive  steps of an argument, he displays much ability. His acuteness and learning were  considerable. He was better acquainted with the theology than the criticism of  the New Testament.(3.) H. Hammond ("Paraphrase and Annotations" on  the N. T., <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-classic-argyle-knit-c-11.html"><strong>Ugg Classic  Argyle Knit</strong></a> Lond. 1653, best ed. 1702; on the Psalms, in  his Works, 4 vols. fol. 1674-84).—This learned annotator was well qualified for  interpretation, and many good </p><br><p>specimens  of criticism are found in his notes. Yet he has not entered deeply into the  spirit of the original, <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/ugg-classic-tall-boots-c-1.html"><strong>Ugg Classic  Tall Boots</strong></a> or developed with uniform success the meaning of  the inspired writers. Many of the most difficult portions he has superficially  examined or wholly mistaken.(4.) M. Poole ("Annotations" on the whole  Bible, Lond. 2 vols. fol. 1700 and before, best ed. Lond. 1840, 3 vols. 8vo).—Poole's annotations on the Holy Bible contain several  valuable, judicious remarks. But their , defects are numerous. The pious author  bad only a partial acquaintance with the original. He was remarkable neither  for profundity nor acuteness. Yet he bad piety and good sense, amazing  industry, and an extensive <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-tassel-boots-c-6.html"><strong>Ugg Tassel  Boots</strong></a> knowledge of the older commentators.Poli  "Synopsis Criticorum" (fol. 4 vols, in 5, Lond. 1669-76, and several  eds. since; best ed. by Leusden, Ultr. 1684).—In this large work, the  annotations of a great number of the older commentators are collected and  condensed, many of them from the still more extensive collection known as the  Criaci Sacri (q. v.), edited by Bp. Pearson and others (2d edit, with two  supplemental vols. Frcft. a. M. 1696-1701,9 vols. fol.). But they are seldom  sifted and criticised, so that the reader is left to choose among them for  himself.(6.) H. Grotius ("Annotationes" on all the Bible and <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-classic-mini-boots-c-8.html"><strong>Ugg Classic  Mini Boots</strong></a> Apocr. in his Opp* also ed. Moody, Lond. 1727, 2  vols. 4to).—This very learned writer investigates the literal sense of the  Scriptures with great diligence and </p><br>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/vaass12/entry-11010425630.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:38:36 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ugg Classic Short Boots</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>spiritualize,  but they do not expound. They sermonize upon a book, but they do not catch its  spirit or comprehend its meaning. When a writer undertakes to educe and exhibit  the true sense of the Bible, he should not give forth his own meditations,  however just and proper in themselves. Put in the room of <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/"><strong>Cheap Ugg Boots</strong></a> exposition, they are wholly out of place. The simple portions of the Bible are  precisely those which require little to be said on them, while to the more  difficult superlative attention should be paid. But the reverse order of  procedure is followed by our popular commentators. They piously descant <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/"><strong>Uggs Clearance</strong></a> on what is well known, leaving the reader in darkness where he most needs  assistance.—Kitto, s. v.4. A very common fault with modern commentators is the  attempt to go over too much ground of text, and thus do the whole work  superficially. Many are ambitious of writing a commentary on the whole Bible,  often with very inadequate preparations, or leisure, or research, and thus do  but little else than rehearso the conclusions of others, with scarcely any  original investigation themselves. The commentator should come to his work only  after a long and matured study of the <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-sienna-miller-boots-c-10.html"><strong>Ugg Sienna  Miller Boots</strong></a> Scriptures as a whole, and then, with great  deliberation, and patient study and balancing of various views and conflicting  opinions, proceed step by </p><br><p>step  with one book at a time; not hastily run over the entire volume, and produce  the crude and first-caught materials that he has gathered suddenly and by  onesided investigations. Hence those annotations are almost always the best  where a writer has confined himself to a single book or epistle, <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/ugg-bailey-button-triplet-c-3.html"><strong>Ugg Bailey  Button Triplet</strong></a> and has perhaps made it his life-long study,  looking at it from every possible point of view, and verifying his conclusions  by repeated comparisons and researches. Commentaries "written to  order" have almost invariably been worthless. See American Biblical  Repository, January, 1833, art. iv.IV. We shall briefly review the principal  works of this class on the Bible (adopting substantially the criticisms on the  older commentaries found in Kitto's Cyclopaedia, s. v.).1. Such as are most  accessible by having been written in English or Latin, or translated into one  of those languages. (See a <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/ugg-classic-short-boots-c-2.html"><strong>Ugg Classic  Short Boots</strong></a> select list of this kind, with criticisms, in  the Supplem. to Jenks's Comprehensive Commentary?) (1.) J. Calvin ("  Commentarii," etc. in his Opp., translated, Edinb. 1845-56, 62 vols.  8vo).—In all the higher qualifications of a commentator Calvin is preeminent.  His knowledge of the original languages was not so great as that of many later  expositors, </p><br>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/vaass12/entry-11010425122.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:37:51 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Discount Ugg Boots</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>but  to thni out the meaning of a place, to exercise independent mental effort upon  it, to apply severe and <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-classic-short-boots-c-4.html"><strong>Ugg Classic  Short Boots</strong></a> rigid examination* to, each sentence and  paragraph of the original, is quite a different process. To exhibit in a lucid  and self-satisfying manner the results of deep thought and indomitable  industry, is far from the intention of those prolix interpreters who, in their  apparent anxiety to compose A fail commentary, present the reader with a chaos  of annotations, and bury the holy sense of the inspired writers beneath the  rubbish of their prosaic musings.2. Some commentators are fond of <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-roxy-short-boots-c-5.html"><strong>Ugg Roxy  Short Boots</strong></a> detailing various opinions without sifting  them. They procure a ntimI ber of former expositions, and write down out of  each \ what is said upon a text. They tell what one and another learned  annotator affirms, but do not search or scrutinize his affirmations. No doubt  an array of names looks imposing; and the reader may stare with surprise at the  extent of research displayed; but nothing is <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/ugg-ultra-tall-boots-c-11.html"><strong>Ugg Ultra  Tall Boots</strong></a> easier than to fill up pages with such  patchwork, and to be as entirely ignorant of the nature of commentary as  before. The intelligent reader will be inclined to say, What matters it to me  what this rabbi has said, or that doctor has stated? I am anxious to know the  true sense of the Scriptures, and not the varying opinions of men concerning  them. It is a work of </p><br><p>supererogation  to collect a multitude of annotations from various sources, most of which the  industrious <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/"><strong>Uggs  Clearance</strong></a> collector knows to be improbable or erroneous. It  is folly to adduce and combat interpretations from which the common sense and  simple piety of the unsophisticated reader turn away with instinctive aversion.  If plausible views be stated, they should be thoroughly analyzed. But in all  cases the right meaning ought to be a prominent thing with the commentator, and  prominently should it be manifested, surrounded, if possible, with those hues  which Heaven itself has given it, and qualified by such circumstances as the  Bible may furnish.3. Another defect consists in dwelling on the easy and  evading the difficult postages. This feature belongs especially to those  English commentaries which are most current among us. By a series of appended  remarks, plain statements are expanded; but wherever there is a real  perplexity, it is glozed over with marvellous superficiality. It may be that  much is said about it, but yet there is no penetration beneath the surface; and  when the reader asks himself what is the true <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/"><strong>Discount Ugg Boots</strong></a> import, he finds himself in the same state of ignorance as when be first took  np the Commentary in question. Pious reflections and multitudinous inferences  enter largely into our popular books of exposition. They </p><br>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/vaass12/entry-11010424618.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:36:59 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ugg Bailey Button Boots</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p>3occupies  itself solely with the theology of the inspired authors — that holy sense which  enlightens and <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-classic-tall-boots-c-2.html"><strong>Ugg Classic  Tall Boots</strong></a> saves mankind. This, however, is rather what  popular commentary should do, than what it has hitherto done.The limits of  critical and popular commentary «re not so wide as to prevent a partial union  of both. Their ultimate object is the same, viz. to present the exact meaning  which the Holy Spirit intended to express. Both may state the import of words  and phrases; both may investigate the course of thought pursued by prophets and  apostles. They may develop processes of argumentation, the scope of the  writers' remarks, the bearing of each particular on a certain purpose, and the  connection <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-bailey-button-boots-c-3.html"><strong>Ugg Bailey  Button Boots</strong></a> between different portions of Scripture. Yet  there is much difficulty in : combining their respective qualities. In  popularmug I the critical, and in elevating the popular to the standard of  intelligent interpretation, there is room for the exercise of great talent. The  former is apt to degenerate into philological sterility, the latter into trite  re| flection. But by vivifying the one, and solidifying the other, a good  degree of affinity would be effected. Critical and antiquarian knowledge should  only be <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/ugg-ultra-short-boots-c-10.html"><strong>Ugg Ultra  Short Boots</strong></a> regarded as a means of arriving at the truth </p><br><p>taught  Geographical, chronological, and historical remarks should solely subserve the  educement or &lt; of Jehovah's will.III. The prominent defects of existing i  ries.—1. Prolixity. This defect chiefly applies to the <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/ugg-roxy-tall-boots-c-6.html"><strong>Ugg Roxy  Tall Boots</strong></a> older works; hence their great size. It is not  unI common to meet with a large folio volume of commentary on a book of  Scripture of moderate extent Thus Byfield, on the Epistle to the Colossians,  fills a folio volume; and Venema, on Jeremiah, two quartos, Peter Martyr's  "most learned and fruitful commentaries upon the Epistle to the  Romans" occupy a folio, and his "commentaries upon the book of  Judges" another tome of the same extent. But Venema on the Psalms, and Caryl  on Job, are still more extravagant, the former extending to no less than six  volumes quarto, the latter to two goodly folios. It is almost superfluous to  remark that such writers wander away, without confining themselves to <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/ugg-bailey-button-boots-c-5.html"><strong>Ugg Bailey  Button Boots</strong></a> exposition. We do not deny that even their  extraneous matter may be good and edifying to those who have the patience to  wade through its labyrinths, but still it is not commentary. It is very easy to  write, currente calama, any thing however remotely connected with a passage, or  to note down the thoughts as they rise; </p><br>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/vaass12/entry-11010424096.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:35:48 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ugg Roxy Short Boots</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/"><strong>Ugg Boots Clearance</strong></a> a coloring to their language. They affected it in such a way as to create terms  for which there are no equivalents in the languages of tribes who are  conversant with different objects, and live amid different relations. In such a  case no expedient is left but circumlocution. By the help of several phrases we  must try to approximate at least the sentiment or shade of thought which the  inspired writers designed to express. Commentary is thus more diffuse than  translation. Its object is not to find words in <a href="http://www.ugg-bootsclearanceus.com/ugg-bailey-button-triplet-c-1.html"><strong>Ugg Bailey  Button Triplet</strong></a> one language corresponding to those of the  original languages of the Scriptures, or nearly resembling them in  significance, but to set forth the meaning of the writers in notes and remarks  of considerable length. Paraphrase occupies a middle place between translation  and commentary, partaking of greater diffuseness than the former, but of less  extent than the latter. It aims at finding equivalent terms to those which the  sacred writers employ, accompanied with others that appear necessary to fill up  the sense, or to spread it out before the mind of the reader in such a form as  the authors themselves might be supposed to have employed in reference to the  people to whom the <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/ugg-delaine-boots-c-8.html"><strong>Ugg Delaine  Boots</strong></a> paraphrast belongs. Scholia differ from commentary  only in brevity. They are short notes on passages of Scripture. Sometimes  difficult places alone are selected as their object; at other times they  embrace continuously an entire book.II. </p><br><p>There  are two kinds of commentary which we shall notice, viz. the critical and the  popular. 1. The former contains grammatical and philological remarks, unfolds  the general and special significations of words, <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/ugg-classic-cardy-boots-c-7.html"><strong>Ugg Classic  Cardy Boots</strong></a> points out idioms and peculiarities of the  original languages, and always brings into view the Hebrew or Greek phraseology  employed by the sacred writers. It dilates on the peculiarities and  difficulties of construction which may present themselves, referring to various  readings, and occasionally bringing into comparison the sentiments and diction  of profane writers, where they resemble those of the Bible. In a word, it takes  a wide range, while it states the processes which lead to results, and shrinks  not from employing the technical language common to scholars. Extended  dissertations are sometimes given, in which the language is made the direct  subject of examination, and; the aid of lexicons and grammars called in to  support or confirm a certain interpretation. 2. Popular commentary states in  perspicuous and untechnical phraseology the sentiments of the holy writers, <a href="http://www.uggboots-clearanceusa.com/ugg-roxy-short-boots-c-9.html"><strong>Ugg Roxy  Short Boots</strong></a> usually witbout detailing the steps by which  that meaning his been discovered. It leaves philological observations to those  whose taste leads them to such studies. All scientific investigations are  avoided. Its great object is to present, in an attractive form, the thoughts of  the sacred authors, so that they may vividly imprest the mind and interest the  heart. It avoids every thing that a reader unacquainted with Hebrew and Greek  would not understand, and </p><br>
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/vaass12/entry-11010423416.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:46:05 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
