<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>whatwggggggのブログ</title>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/whatwgggggg/</link>
<atom:link href="https://rssblog.ameba.jp/whatwgggggg/rss20.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
<description>ブログの説明を入力します。</description>
<language>ja</language>
<item>
<title>Apple agrees to settle e-</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Apple has agreed an out-of-court settlement in a case in which it was being sued by consumers who overpaid for e-books due to price-fixing between the tech giant and publishers.<br><br>A court document filed in New York says a "binding agreement" has been reached.<br><br>The amount of compensation offered by Apple is not revealed, but the litigants were thought to have been seeking up to $840m (￡495m).<br><br>Apple has consistently denied any wrongdoing over e-book pricing.<br><br>The impending trial, in which 33 US states and territories were seeking reparations from Apple on behalf of their citizens, was linked to a separate ruling last year, where a judge said Apple had violated anti-trust laws by striking deals to enable them to charge a higher price for some e-books in its online store.<br><br>As well as the authorities taking action, several individuals from across the US were also seeking compensation for overpaying in their e-book purchases.<br><br>The allegation was that Apple, a distributor of e-books, had illegally conspired with five of the biggest publishers to stop Amazon - a dominant force in the market - selling titles at a loss.<br><br>Previously, publishers had sold e-books to distributors at a wholesale price, with retailers such as Amazon and Apple able to set their own sale prices.<br><br>But the court case heard that the publishers (Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Penguin Group (USA) Inc, Macmillan and Simon &amp; Schuster Inc) had agreed with Apple to move to an "agency model," in which the publishers agree a minimum retail price with distributors, thus preventing them from offering titles at a loss.<br><br>However Apple denied that it was involved in price-fixing, accusing plaintiffs of "false accusations", and is in the process of challenging last July's ruling.<br><br>The publishers agreed to pay more than $166m to settle charges brought against them.<br><br>The out-of-court settlement marks an about-turn from Apple, whose chief executive, Tim Cook, had previously dismissed the idea of reaching an agreement.<br><br>The firm declined to comment on the decision.<br><br>Any deal is subject to the outcome of Apple's appeal of last year's case.
]]>
</description>
<link>https://ameblo.jp/whatwgggggg/entry-11882273044.html</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 13:10:42 +0900</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
